I have two amazing kids. They are gorgeous, smart, funny, and from time to time, total fucking assholes.
In some ways, I believe that it’s a child’s job to be an asshole. They need to push limits, to lash out against boundaries to see where the walls are. My role as a parent sometimes feels like part-zookeeper, part-adoring fan/cheerleader, part-cuddlebunny.
It’s the zookeeper part I wanna talk about.
Today, a mom on one of my mommy email groups posted this article listing some positive alternatives to time-outs. Since my son spent 20 minutes in a time-out this morning, I was keen to get some new ideas.
“Parenting coach” Amy McCready’s #1 suggestion on the list — as an alternative to time-out — is:
1. Give a Giant Hug – Do the unexpected! When your child misbehaves he’s waiting for the hammer, instead, do just the opposite of what he expects. He’ll be thrown completely off-guard!
Cute, ineffective idea! To me, this is the opposite of…parenting. Let me explain.
My goal as a parent is to raise loving, socially-conscious children who take responsibility for their actions and make good choices. This means my kids need to feel connected to people in a positive way (the hug part), but they also need to understand that how they choose to behave will shape the way people perceive and behave towards them.
Bad behavior gets negative reactions. Period. Learn something from it, and then make a different choice next time.
To do this, some of the tools of Positive Parenting are needed, but so is the collective wisdom of the ages, or at least of behavioral psychology. BF Skinner showed us that positive reinforcement encourages the reinforced behavior. For example, if my son throws his sippy cup across the room because he’s done with it, and doesn’t feel like walking to the table, what message am I sending him by giving him a hug at that moment?
Please Do That Again! That was awesome! Wow, what a strong throwing arm you have!
The list exemplifies the problem I have with child-centered, “Positive” parenting. The underlying philosophy in this parenting style is non-violence, which I am definitely cool with. But. It also advises parents to go down a path that puts the responsibility for irresponsible, undesirable and completely unacceptable behavior squarely on the shoulders of…the parent.
Ignoring, deflecting or denying bad behavior might work for toddlers, but beyond that, parents need a more sophisticated, more flexible & inclusive group of discipline & teaching tools in our toolboxes.
After reading the list, I stand by the time-out my little guy got this morning. My response was quick, appropriate and resolute. After he’d done his time, we talked about the context to make sure he was clear on what behavior I’d reacted to. “Throwing my cup,” he said. Next time, he is to place the cup on the table, or ask for help.
In this case, none of the “10 alternatives” was appropriate, because his Throwing Stuff habit needs to be stopped, NOW. Directly. Immediately. There may be other times when some of the “10 alternatives” will be appropriate, but to call time-out “as dated as MySpace” is an unrealistic and unhelpful judgment that underscores the problem with interpreting “positive discipline” as “discipline without consequences”.
In my experience, that is no kind of discipline at all.




